Give the People What They Want!

Three down and two to go and the will of Vermont has never been so clear. More than a hundred residents came out to the Montpelier Elks Club last night for the third in a series of DPS forums designed to gauge public opinion on Vermont’s energy future. The clear sentiment – Vermonters want wind and renewables, not nuclear and fossil fuels!

Those in attendance ranked coal, oil, and nuclear power among the three bottom choices for Vermont’s future energy mix. The top three choices - you guessed it – energy efficiency, wind, and hydro.

Other noteworthy findings include the following:

• 97% wanted to see Vermont increase energy from renewables;
• 70% strongly agreed that Vermont should require that a minimum of electricity sold should come from renewables;
• 78% would strongly support a wind farm even if it were visible from where they lived;
• 81% thought that over the next 10 years Vermont should increase efficiency spending;
• And voters were most “extremely concerned” about radioactive waste and greenhouse gases.

This forum was a great exercise in democracy. Give the people a voice and they’ll make thoughtful decisions. Let’s just hope that our leaders and the DPS take the wants of Vermonters seriously!

To sign up for the last two hearings, click here.

By Charity Carbine, VPIRG Environmental Health Advocate

Entergy Push Poll Can’t Hide the Truth

I guess Vermonters can’t be trusted to think for themselves. At least that’s what Entergy Nuclear, Vermont Yankee’s owner, thinks.

In recent days, irritated Vermonters have reported being the victims of an Entergy push poll. For those of you unfamiliar with this unscrupulous tactic, push polling is often used in political campaigns as a way to manipulate the opinions of voters and circulate negative information on the opposition. What’s worse is that this shifty attempt to sway voters is veiled as a legitimate survey!

In the case of Entergy, the recent collapsed cooling tower and emergency shutdown have created such a public relations maelstrom that the poll was pushing “positive” information about Vermont Yankee. Unfortunately for Entergy, no amount of spin is going to save them from the truth…Vermonters don’t want or need an aging nuclear facility that is literally falling apart!

This was made evident in the first of a series of Department of Public Service (DPS) regional energy forums. At the St. Johnsbury hearing last week, Northeast Kingdom residents showed overwhelming support for renewable energy and strong opposition on our continued reliance on nuclear power. And if we know Vermonters, we anticipate similar outcomes for the remaining public engagement hearings. Perhaps this is why Entergy felt the need to conduct the poll?

So don’t let Entergy “push” you around. Let your voice be heard and register for the upcoming forums in Burlington, Montpelier, Springfield and Rutland!

Click here to register for the hearings. Much like an election, if you don't register you can't vote, so sign on up!

Charity Carbine

DPS energy hearings start with a BANG!

Last night’s energy forum in St. Johnsbury was a BLAST! Faced with the tough choice of how to meet our future energy needs, voters came through with the answer :

We can choose to continue relying on dirty and expensive sources like Yankee and fossil fuels with disastrous consequences for our climate, economy and environment. Or choose a brighter energy future that creates thousands of jobs, cuts global warming pollution, and leaves our children a legacy of prosperity.

I was pleasantly surprised, with a few caveats, that the forum presented the choice before Vermonters in reasonable terms. Presented with that evidence, an overwhelming number of the Northeast Kingdom voters who showed up wanted renewable energy and energy efficiency to meet our future electricity needs. They also strongly opposed continued reliance on nukes, fossil fuels, and imported power.

Some examples:

• 84% of voters wanted Vermont to get more power from renewable sources;
• When asked if government should require utilities to to provide a minimum percentage of power from renewables: 53% strongly agreed, and only 15% strongly disagreed;
• 75% support increased funding for Efficiency Vermont;
• and, when asked to rate their level of concern about various environmental impacts, voters were nearly twice as concerned about nuclear waste and global warming as they were about the visual impacts of wind turbines.

(more results in the full report)

I’m excited about the upcoming forums in Burlington, Montpelier, Springfield and Rutland and encourage everyone to join us at one for a powerful evening where voters have a real chance to shape our energy future….don’t forget to register!

Here’s the full (long) report.

Another take on the day of near overrides

I said earlier this week that no matter which way the votes went on July 11 we would make history. Not to toot my own horn, but I sure was right.

Sean and Colleen's posts below cover a lot of the mood and feeling of the day. I wanted to add my own perspective as well. I also want to succinctly lay out all of the various votes that happened that day because I think that story of procedure is illuminating in this case.

The first vote, and first surprise of the day actually happened in the Senate which voted early in the day to override the governor's veto 24-5, with one Senator absent (get the roll call here). The outcome may have been expected but one surprise was Sen. Scott (R-Washington) who crossed party lines to support the implementation of S.164's common-sense limits on campaign contributions.

While the Senate was voting, the crowd of override supporters inside the statehouse was building. By 9:30 I'd already run out of our first 250 piece printing of 1-page of talking points for citizen lobbyists. By 10 am when the House convened to take up the global warming bill we were overflowing the House chamber and doing out best not to obstruct traffic in the halls.

And when the House broke to caucus at about 10:30, we were at our peak of attendance, about 400 people, and absolutely jammed rooms 10 and 11 where the Republicans and Democrats, respectively, met to debate the bill's merits by party. I literally could not get in the door to room 10, but heard that some legislators were a little annoyed to find a crowd of constituents and citizens taking up most of the room's chairs. In Room 11, which I did squeeze into for a minute, people were seated in ever square inch of floor space, as well as in every chair, and Speaker Symington got several impromptu ovations from the crowd for her defense of the bill. What I remember most from the Speaker's speech, which i admittedly did not hear all of, was her request that members of her party remember that "Our votes today are going to build the future our children and grand children live in. That's what this vote is about."

But the speaker's passionate appeal, the 400 citizens, the thousands of phone calls and the will of 72% of Vermonters was denied on Wednesday. At a little after 11am, the House re-convened to take up H.520. There were some powerful speeches both for and against the bill: rep Rachel Weston spoke eloquently in defense of the bill and the override I thought. As did our perennial champion on this issue, Rep. Klein of east Montpelier.

By now you'll have read the coverage that we once again won the majority, but not a big enough one to enact the bill: 86-61 was the vote, almost identical to what it was last time. We did convince a few Reps to change their vote and support the bill. But in the end the united front of big business and the governor proved to big an obstacle for just over 1/3 of elected Representatives.

It was the among the toughest 5 minutes of my life when they called that roll and so few Representatives had changed their minds. I know it was tough for a lot of you too, who have worked so hard to make global warming a priority for the House and Senate. But like any activist worth his salt, I quickly converted my disappointment to outrage. And when the House adjourned for lunch and a torrential rain storm prevented our plans for a rock-concert and rally on the front steps we did the only thing we could: James Moore and I marched up to the Speaker's office and demanded that the public be given the use of the House floor for 20 minutes so we could to tell the assembled activists that the fight was not over yet.

20 minutes later, James climbed up to the speaker's podium and from the applause you would have thought he was a conquering hero. Even after the difficult defeat, our crowd filled all 150 seats the legislature uses, plus most of the gallery. And when Bill McKibben told them that the issue wasn't going away and neither would we until the governor and ALL legislators start listening, the cheers form the crown could be heard all over the building.

But the biggest surprise came from the last speakers to join us on the floor of the House: Senate President Peter Shumlin and Senate Majority Leader John Campbell jogged into the room fresh from a hurried lunch-meeting with the Speaker. Over lunch and in light of the narrow loss in the House, the Senators had agreed to press their chamber to suspend it's own rules and take up a compromise energy bill based on H.520, but without the tax on Vermont Yankee. Suddenly, energy and global warming legislation was alive again in the statehouse as Shumlin and Campbell worked with senators from both parties to forge a consensus on the bill.

Meanwhile, our crowd cleared the floor and the house took up S.164. The vote count was incredibly close, and House Republicans that had been considering breaking party ranks to support the override as Sen. Scott had already done could be seen getting a thorough dressing-down from party leadership just outside the chamber. In the end, however, we turned up one vote short 97-50 (3 likely yes votes were absent) and fat-cats and special interests gained a 6-month reprieve from any limits on spending. That vote won't stand for long, however. As soon as the House reconvenes in January and attendance is more likely from those missing 3 legislators, look for this bill to re-appear on the floor and get enacted quickly with few if any amendments.

Finally, we were down to the true last hope for the energy bill. The senate motion to suspend rules passed and the bill was given debate and consideration. In one telling moment I saw republican Senators Phil Scott, Bill Doyle and Lt. Gov. Brian Dubie (who presides over the Senate) with their head's close together just outside the Governor's office. If you saw Chanel 3's coverage (read the transcript here), you know that the Governor was having none of it. Despite impassioned requests from legislative leadership and members of his own party, the Governor refused any compromise on energy and climate legislation: at one point he even refused to speak to Speaker Symington, and sent his chief of Staff Betsy Bishop out to send her away while he remained sequestered away in his office behind a heavy door and 2 state troopers.

Even without the governor, we were able to convince a bi-partisan coalition of Senators to support the compromise energy bill, which passed 23-6. But the Republicans in the House were not as willing to move legislation as their Senate Counterparts. In a striking moment of partisan-division obstructing progress on an issue that has clearly captured public attention: the House split exactly along party lines - 93-49 - on a vote about whether or not to even consider the new bill from the Senate. That vote was short of the 3/4 majority needed to suspend the Houses' rules. With that, climate change legislation was truly dead for the year. The House voted to adjourn a few minutes later and we were left with the re-caps, the spin and about 500 little plastic sticker-backings to clean up.

In all, the day was a disappointment for sure. But it was also hugely energizing. As Paul and several other staff have noted, this was one of the largest turnouts in State House history. And coming as it did on a work-day in the middle of July, that is an achievement in itself.

The Senate's willingness several times to look beyond partisan wrangling and back legislation that was good for Vermont was also encouraging and a sure sign that in Vermont, as in the national Congress, we sometimes look to the smaller and more collegial of our two legislative bodies to provide leadership on challenging policy issues.

And finally I am given hope by the simple math of it all: a shrinking minority of legislators and the Governor opposed our bills. They backed the interests of a handful of multi-billion dollar corporations and fat-cat donors. But just how long do you think they can hold out with 73% of the public and the legislature supporting our cause? How long can a majority block, filibuster and obstruct progress before passage of time and rising of consciousness deliver a victory to our team?

Not long I think, not long. Stay tuned. The last vote on global warming is not cast yet in the legislature or in the voting booth and we're counting on your support to win the next round.

Overrides Fail But the Battle Goes On...

Nearly 500 Vermonters filled the State House today in a passionate attempt to get their legislators to put politics aside and do the right thing for the future of this state by overriding two gubenatorial vetos of the campaign finance reform and global warming energy bills. Sadly, in both cases enough of those legislators failed to listen to the overwhelming majority of Vermonters and chose special interest over the public interest by voting to sustain the vetoes.

The good news is that we gained momentum -- and votes -- on every vote today. That, together with the hundreds of Vermonters that joined us in this effort, will help ensure that we carry this momentum forward to make sure that in the end, we prevail. As Bill McKibben said today, we are gaining momentum and we're not going away.

Stay tuned for more details from today's momentous events, including the appearance at the State House of that single polar bear that Jim Douglas refuses to help.

Are you ready to rumble?

Tomorrow is the big day for both campaign finance and global warming. The VPIRG office is a hub of activity: a crew of interns from our sibling-organization TAC is making posters and cutting the bright green stickers that activists will be wearing to identify themselves as pro-override; the copier is running at maximum speed churning out talking points, posters and flyers; and staff are furiously answering calls and emails from citizens all over the state who want to be part of the history made tomorrow. In a minute you'll get an email from us inviting you to join us at the State House tomorrow or call your legislator and tell them to vote yes on both override votes.

Earlier today, we held a news conference with AARP and VBSR releasing new poll data that shows a whopping 72% of Vermonters support H.520's plan to cut heating bills and global warming pollution. We also released a list of more than 150 Vermont businesses that have signed a petition endorsing the override - so much for the bill being anti-business, huh? Moments after our press conference ended, the Speaker and Pro-Tem emerged from a last meeting with Governor seeking a fair compromise on the bill. They left empty-handed. Governor Douglas, it seems, is more interested in scoring political points than advancing legislation that will lower heating bills, create jobs and fight global warming.

And so we go once more to the breach, and it's going to be quite a show. Not just the vote, mind you: our plans include speeches from Bill McKibben, musical performances by X10 and a local rock group, and a visit from a friendly polar bear - you know, the one Douglas doesn't think we can save?

I do hope you can join us, and once again I'll be blogging from the floor whenever the vote gets underway...thanks again!

What's up with the global warming override?

It's been a busy few weeks here at VPIRG and we are fielding a lot of calls from people asking "what's up with the that veto override on global warming?"


The answer is - well - complicated. But let me try and untangle the recent news into a clear narrative:


1) A growing list of celebrities and opinion leaders are joining the call for the override: Al Gore endorsed the override on June 6. Then last week local high school students and rappers X10 put out a serious, and seriously funny video endorsing the override. Now Bill McKibben has joined the call, inviting all Vermonters to join him at the State House on July 11 as we seek to make Vermont a national leader in the fight to stop global warming. Their support, and the voices of literally thousands of Vermonters like you has lead to an extraordinary few weeks of news and opinion coverage of this topic. It's been exciting seeing all these folks come together in support of the bill, and it's definitely making an impact on the legislators. We're hearing news that we're picking up more and more votes, but there's more work to be done (see below).


2) Democratic leaders did propose a compromise, but Douglas vetoed that too. As you may have read in the news, Senate Pro-Tem Peter Shumlin and House Chairman of the Energy and Natural Resource Committee Robert Dostis were planning to meet with Governor Douglas last week. The purpose of the meeting: to discuss the global warming bill and see if common ground or compromise could be found before the override vote on the 11th. But Douglas cancelled the meeting at the last minute, and Press Secretary Jason Gibbs made it clear that the Governor was not interested in any version of the bill. This sets up a tough scenario for the most talked-about version of a compromise: namely removing just the portion of the bill that makes Vermont Yankee pay the same property tax rate as wind farms (the bill would still contain about $17 million in funding from other sources, including a tax on wind farms).
To even vote on such a compromise, 3/4 of legislators would need to first support a procedural motion to 'suspend the rules' of the House. With the governor and special interests still opposing the bill -- even with the element they say most concerns them removed -- it's tough to envision coming up with the votes to pass such a compromise.


3) Which brings us to the bottom line: the vote to override the global warming veto is still on for July 11 and we need your help to win it. 3 things you can do to help in order of simplicity: Click here to email your Representatives and ask them to VOTE YES on the global warming override; Volunteer 2 hours to help call VPIRG members and ask them to support of the override by emailing drew@vpirg.org; Join us on July 11 at 9AM at the VT State House.


Thanks again for all you're doing, hope to see you soon.

Waiting for the Axe

It's been almost a month since the legisalture took a bold step forward on energy and global warming. After months of work, thousands of calls, hundreds of emails, 71 Step It Up events and innumerable local conversations, the Vermont legislature passed H.520 a comprehensive global warming bill. (In case you missed it, read our play-by-play posts from the floor)

The final bill has many parts, but accomplishes three main goals:

1. Invests in renewable energy by requiring Vermont utilities to supply 25% of our power from clean local sources by 2012;
2. Makes it easier for businesses and individuals to invest in small renewable energy projects;
3. Improves efficiency by tightening building codes and expanding the mandate and funding of Efficiency Vermont so they can help us use less heating oil as well as electricity.

All this is paid for by making Vermont Yankee pay the same property tax rate as wind farms will pay (VYcurrently pays less than 1/3rd as much).

And that’s where the controversy lies: Governor Douglas is opposed to the bill because it taxes Yankee. His opposition, combined with a massive PR and lobbying campaign by Vermont Yankee (remember the ad wars?) made the fight to pass the bill though our House a huge challenge. In the end we got 85 representatives to vote in favor.

But now the Governor is about to veto the bill. It’s outrageous, but he’s sticking up for the profit margins of Entergy instead of for a bill that will make Vermont more affordable, create jobs, and fight global warming.

But there’s good news: the legislature will reconvene on July 11th to override the governor’s veto. (click here to learn more) We have this one chance to get 2/3 of our legislature to do the right thing. If we win, Vermont will be the first state in the nation to stand up to the oil industry, the nuclear industry, and the big utilities and get serious about an economy driven by renewable and energy independence.

GLOBAL WARMING BILL PASSES

final vote by my count is 86 in favor, 60 opposed, 3 absent.

Thanks to all for hard work to get this bill done, the strong margin is a reflection of all the work Vermonters have done to demand action on global warming.

Huzzah!

post from the floor of the Vermont State House

Post # 2 from the statehouse floor.
Debate still raging. Several Representatives have attacked the bill and Rep. Shap Smith, Rep. Tony Klein and Robert Dostis are defending it.

Opponents agreements focus in 3 main areas: 1) that the process creating this bill is flawed, 2) that the tax on Vermont Yankee is unfair or violates an earlier ‘deal’ and 3) that taxing Vermont Yankee will hurt business in the state.

Several members have noted that they supported H.520 when it passed the House some weeks ago, and feel that this version goes too far. That’s tremendously misleading since, as you may remember (click here and scroll down if you need a refresher), the bill passed weeks ago was weak and would have done little to stop global warming.

The bill as being considered today WILL do something about global warming and that’s why many representatives are standing up to defend it, citing experiences with Bill McKibben’s walk last summer, Step It Up events and the enormous number of letters, calls and comments you’ve sent in over the last few months.
Sitting on the floor of the VT House as the representatives file in to vote on H.520, the comprehensive global warming bill we’ve been working on all year. Today promises to be an historic vote … one way or another.

I spent most of the last hour in the Democratic caucus. There were several good and moving speeches in favor of the bill. Most notably to my mind:
1) Tony Klein (D-E. Montpelier) did an excellent job defending the bill, explaining its merits and putting into perspective the limited life-span of Vermont Yankee.
2) House Speaker Gaye Symington also spoke eloquently and passionately about the difference between being for a bill with no money, which will do nothing to stop global warming, and being for a bill that has the funds it needs to be effective at stopping global warming.
3) On the negative side, Al Perry (D-Richford) spoke strongly in opposition to the bill. We’re worried his speech may have moved other democrats, especially those from Franklin County, to oppose the bill.

I’ll post again when debate gets going.

Global Warming bill passes Senate

Many of you have joined us this year in advocating for legislation that addresses global warming. VPIRG members packed town halls and church basements at the start of the session, called and emailed Senators and House reps literally thousands of times, and marched in Step It Up Rallies demanding action, not just talk, to avert climate disaster.

Now, after months of action your work is finally paying off: Yesterday the Senate voted to pass H.520, the omnibus energy and climate act (more info below) by a razor thin margin. I was there for the last minute wrangling before key procedural votes Tuesday and Wednesday and can attest to the reports that virtually every corporate lobbyist in the State House is working to kill the bill, which is the only legislation still moving that will help stop global warming.

On Tuesday, Entergy and the Governor fought hard all morning to line up votes to kill the bill. They very nearly succeeded. A morning vote was postponed, and VPIRG staff worked the phones to get calls in to wavering Senators form our members in their districts. By 3:30, we knew we were making progress, but also that the vote was very close. By 7:00 that night, after several hours of debate the Senate voted by the thinnest of margins: 15-14 to keep the bills funding intact and later sent it to a third and final reading.

We thought we were out of the woods, and sent an email alert to our members encouraging them to contact their House representatives, where a close vote is expected soon once a conference committee works through a few remaining details.

But Sen. Racine of Chittenden County considered introducing another amendment to cut H.520’s funding by 95%. So VPIRG was back on the phone Wednesday morning too, calling a handful of members in Chittenden, Franklin and Windsor counties to ask them to contact your Senators in the moments before they took the floor to vote. It was a tense and fast-paced morning, but our work paid off a second time: Sen. Racine withdrew his amendment. And when a similar Sen. Mullin of Rutland offered a similar amendment, many of the same Senators members had called voted correctly, and kept the funding for S.94 intact.

All eyes are now turning to the House, where our opponents will spare no expense following their loss in the Senate. Your voice is needed! A close vote is expected as early as next week. It is essential that every member of the House hear from constituents that global warming is a must-pass issue this session.

You can help by contacting your House Representative(s) through the Sargent at Arms office 802-828-2228, or VPIRG’s website. We also need help calling lists of VPIRG members across the state, only about 10% of our members are on our email list, and we need to reach more of you than ever before on this important bill. Contact me at 223-8421 x4787 or drew@vpirg.org if you’re interested in volunteering one or more hours in the next 10 days to help pass the most aggressive climate legislation in the country.

Yours in action,
Drew Hudson
VPIRG Director of Field and Communications.

More info
• Allows Efficiency Vermont to help Vermonters save money and stop global warming by using less heating fuel as well as electricity;
• Funds the expanded Efficiency Vermont with a tax on Vermont Yankee’s windfall profits;
• Requires that our utilities purchase 20-25% of our electricity from renewable generators by 2012;
• Helps Vermonter’s install small wind, solar and other renewables to lower their electric bills and Vermont’s global warming emissions;
• Supports the development of wind farms in Vermont by guaranteeing them a fair tax rate;
• Gives incentives for individuals and businesses to develop larger solar power systems;
• And more…

Stepin' it Up with VPIRG

It was a fantastic day, despite the cold and damp weather in the morning, thousands of Vermonters turned out to more than 70 events all over the state demanding that our leaders step it up by cutting carbon 80% by 2050. VPIRG staff heard reports from dozens of events, and directly participated in two: Montpelier and Burlington.

In Montpelier hundreds of central-Vermonters marched from Morse Farm to the statehouse. Burr Morse, a one of a kind 7th generation sugarer lead off our event at the farm by discussing the local impacts of global warming. Joined by Onion River Sports owner Andrew Brewer and local High School Student Colin Arisman, Burr sent a message that was carried loud and clear on WCAX: We can’t afford any more inaction on global warming, our environment and our economy depend on us finding an answer to this problem -- and soon.

After Burr, Andrew and Colin spoke about the bad news, VPIRG’s own Andrea Stander lead the march down the hill to the statehouse. We met up along the way with Senator Bernie Sanders and VT-Senate President Peter Shumlin. We arrived at the statehouse lawn in a roar of chants, music, and calls for action. Bernie took the stage first, happy to pledge continued support of his bill in the US Senate to cut carbon 80% by 2050. VPIRG’s Drew Hudson read a short statement from Congressman Welch, who is backing similar legislation in the House, but was in Iraq on the 14th and could not join us. Finally, Senator Shumlin took the stage and boldly signed a 3 part pledge to enact laws that will achieve the 80% cuts scientists tell us are necessary to stop global warming.

The crowd literally was literally screaming for Governor Douglas, who attended exactly zero step it up events, despite having only 2 ribbon cuttings on his schedule. No word yet on whether he plans to stick to his earlier promises to enact policies to cut global warming pollution, or if he will flip-flop and veto legislation under consideration this year. But you know VPIRG will be watching, and you can join our email network to get the news before it breaks!

~ Drew Hudson

Well, we couldn’t have asked for a better Step It Up event in Burlington. We started off the day early with an 11 am talk on how to influence you friends, family, and government into taking responsible action for climate change. Then the team broke up into 6 groups and spread through out the city.

The first three groups went tabling in and around downtown Burlington for 10% challenge and for the big rally that would happen later in the day. The fourth group built a traveling display out of some 150 2 liter bottles that showed how much co2 emission you put out traveling the one mile from UVM campus to Lake Champlain. The fifth group hit the North End and exchanged old inefficient light bulbs for newer more efficient CFL’s. The sixth and final group stayed at home base and got on with the process of setting up the event.

So finally, at 5pm, with the free ice cream stand from Ben & Jerry’s rockin’ and the place starting to fill up the event got underway. From Sen. Bernie Sanders, to Burlington Mayor Bob Kiss, to a myriad of State Rep’s, to musicians, poets, and even a talking dinosaur the 450 people who made up the congregation on the shores of Lake Champlain to ask Congress to cut Carbon Emissions 80% by 2050 was simply huge.

The group of women and men who put this event together had a monumental job and they did it well. Kudos to them and kudos to all of you who made it to Burlington or any one of the myriad of other Step It Up’s that went on around the state! Together, showing this type of solidarity we can do what it takes to make real change and reverse the damage being done to the climate right now.

~ Sean Sarah

The Sham Of Nuke Power

For those of us working to shut down Vermont Yankee, we know we're up for a fight. We're up against a well-financed corporate PR machine that has already been placing misleading ads in newspapers across Vermont. We wanted to share with our readers the following article about this tactic of false advertising and let you know that VPIRG and our partners in the Safe Power Vermont coalition will be working hard to counter this disinformation with the facts that Vermonters need to make a well-informed decision on how to secure Vermont's clean AND SAFE energy future!

The Sham Of Nuke Power & Patrick Moore
Opinion: Harvey Wasserman
February 28, 2007
From: http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/7/2007/1502

Vermont, like too many other places with nuke reactors, was recently disgraced by an industry-sponsored visit from Patrick Moore, who claims to be a "founder" of Greenpeace, and who is out selling nuclear power as a "green" technology. The two claims are roughly equal in the baldness of their falsehood. But the impacts of the lies about Vermont Yankee---like so many other reactors---are far more serious. Read the full article here.