Is President Bush Threatening Dr. Dynasaur?

Many of you may have read the recent news over the battle to fully fund the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Here at VPIRG, we have heard from several members who want to know what, if anything, this could mean for Dr. Dynasaur.

First a little history for clarification: Most of our members will remember that about 10 years ago Vermont became a national leader in the fight to insure all our kids when we passed Dr Dynasaur. It’s been a tremendously successful program, and is in many ways the blueprint for our vision of a health care system where every Vermonter has access to quality, affordable health care. But while Dr. Dynasaur’s greatest strength is that it offers every child in Vermont access to insurance, the funding for the program is a little more complicated: What looks like a single, comprehensive system on the patient’s end is actually funded by a mish-mash of state and federal tax-dollars, private companies and the parents of the insured children.

SCHIP is one of the ways in which Dr. Dynasaur is funded. If you haven’t heard, SCHIP is a federal program that provides states with health insurance funding for low-income children and their families. The Bush administration is seeking to “refocus” the program so that only children at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL - about 40,000/year for a family of four) are covered. If this proposal is adopted, it could adversely impact 28 states, including Vermont. Currently, Vermont receives SCHIP funding for children between 225 and 300 percent FPL (~45-60,000/year for a family of four) who are without health insurance. And if nothing is done by September 30th, the program’s funding expires altogether.

The good news is that state officials are working on a plan. If Congress passes the SCHIP legislation in its current form, Vermont will endeavor to insure the kids who lose coverage through changes to SCHIP by moving them into Vermont’s Global Commitment Waiver (which is facing its own problems) and make up the difference with state funds. While it’s disturbing to see the federal government scaling back health care coverage for kids, at this point in time there is no reason to believe that a scale-back in SCHIP funding will lead to loss of coverage for Vermont children.

As always, we will continue to watchdog the issue and keep you informed.

By Stefanie L. Sidortsova
VPIRG Health Care Advocate

Another take on the day of near overrides

I said earlier this week that no matter which way the votes went on July 11 we would make history. Not to toot my own horn, but I sure was right.

Sean and Colleen's posts below cover a lot of the mood and feeling of the day. I wanted to add my own perspective as well. I also want to succinctly lay out all of the various votes that happened that day because I think that story of procedure is illuminating in this case.

The first vote, and first surprise of the day actually happened in the Senate which voted early in the day to override the governor's veto 24-5, with one Senator absent (get the roll call here). The outcome may have been expected but one surprise was Sen. Scott (R-Washington) who crossed party lines to support the implementation of S.164's common-sense limits on campaign contributions.

While the Senate was voting, the crowd of override supporters inside the statehouse was building. By 9:30 I'd already run out of our first 250 piece printing of 1-page of talking points for citizen lobbyists. By 10 am when the House convened to take up the global warming bill we were overflowing the House chamber and doing out best not to obstruct traffic in the halls.

And when the House broke to caucus at about 10:30, we were at our peak of attendance, about 400 people, and absolutely jammed rooms 10 and 11 where the Republicans and Democrats, respectively, met to debate the bill's merits by party. I literally could not get in the door to room 10, but heard that some legislators were a little annoyed to find a crowd of constituents and citizens taking up most of the room's chairs. In Room 11, which I did squeeze into for a minute, people were seated in ever square inch of floor space, as well as in every chair, and Speaker Symington got several impromptu ovations from the crowd for her defense of the bill. What I remember most from the Speaker's speech, which i admittedly did not hear all of, was her request that members of her party remember that "Our votes today are going to build the future our children and grand children live in. That's what this vote is about."

But the speaker's passionate appeal, the 400 citizens, the thousands of phone calls and the will of 72% of Vermonters was denied on Wednesday. At a little after 11am, the House re-convened to take up H.520. There were some powerful speeches both for and against the bill: rep Rachel Weston spoke eloquently in defense of the bill and the override I thought. As did our perennial champion on this issue, Rep. Klein of east Montpelier.

By now you'll have read the coverage that we once again won the majority, but not a big enough one to enact the bill: 86-61 was the vote, almost identical to what it was last time. We did convince a few Reps to change their vote and support the bill. But in the end the united front of big business and the governor proved to big an obstacle for just over 1/3 of elected Representatives.

It was the among the toughest 5 minutes of my life when they called that roll and so few Representatives had changed their minds. I know it was tough for a lot of you too, who have worked so hard to make global warming a priority for the House and Senate. But like any activist worth his salt, I quickly converted my disappointment to outrage. And when the House adjourned for lunch and a torrential rain storm prevented our plans for a rock-concert and rally on the front steps we did the only thing we could: James Moore and I marched up to the Speaker's office and demanded that the public be given the use of the House floor for 20 minutes so we could to tell the assembled activists that the fight was not over yet.

20 minutes later, James climbed up to the speaker's podium and from the applause you would have thought he was a conquering hero. Even after the difficult defeat, our crowd filled all 150 seats the legislature uses, plus most of the gallery. And when Bill McKibben told them that the issue wasn't going away and neither would we until the governor and ALL legislators start listening, the cheers form the crown could be heard all over the building.

But the biggest surprise came from the last speakers to join us on the floor of the House: Senate President Peter Shumlin and Senate Majority Leader John Campbell jogged into the room fresh from a hurried lunch-meeting with the Speaker. Over lunch and in light of the narrow loss in the House, the Senators had agreed to press their chamber to suspend it's own rules and take up a compromise energy bill based on H.520, but without the tax on Vermont Yankee. Suddenly, energy and global warming legislation was alive again in the statehouse as Shumlin and Campbell worked with senators from both parties to forge a consensus on the bill.

Meanwhile, our crowd cleared the floor and the house took up S.164. The vote count was incredibly close, and House Republicans that had been considering breaking party ranks to support the override as Sen. Scott had already done could be seen getting a thorough dressing-down from party leadership just outside the chamber. In the end, however, we turned up one vote short 97-50 (3 likely yes votes were absent) and fat-cats and special interests gained a 6-month reprieve from any limits on spending. That vote won't stand for long, however. As soon as the House reconvenes in January and attendance is more likely from those missing 3 legislators, look for this bill to re-appear on the floor and get enacted quickly with few if any amendments.

Finally, we were down to the true last hope for the energy bill. The senate motion to suspend rules passed and the bill was given debate and consideration. In one telling moment I saw republican Senators Phil Scott, Bill Doyle and Lt. Gov. Brian Dubie (who presides over the Senate) with their head's close together just outside the Governor's office. If you saw Chanel 3's coverage (read the transcript here), you know that the Governor was having none of it. Despite impassioned requests from legislative leadership and members of his own party, the Governor refused any compromise on energy and climate legislation: at one point he even refused to speak to Speaker Symington, and sent his chief of Staff Betsy Bishop out to send her away while he remained sequestered away in his office behind a heavy door and 2 state troopers.

Even without the governor, we were able to convince a bi-partisan coalition of Senators to support the compromise energy bill, which passed 23-6. But the Republicans in the House were not as willing to move legislation as their Senate Counterparts. In a striking moment of partisan-division obstructing progress on an issue that has clearly captured public attention: the House split exactly along party lines - 93-49 - on a vote about whether or not to even consider the new bill from the Senate. That vote was short of the 3/4 majority needed to suspend the Houses' rules. With that, climate change legislation was truly dead for the year. The House voted to adjourn a few minutes later and we were left with the re-caps, the spin and about 500 little plastic sticker-backings to clean up.

In all, the day was a disappointment for sure. But it was also hugely energizing. As Paul and several other staff have noted, this was one of the largest turnouts in State House history. And coming as it did on a work-day in the middle of July, that is an achievement in itself.

The Senate's willingness several times to look beyond partisan wrangling and back legislation that was good for Vermont was also encouraging and a sure sign that in Vermont, as in the national Congress, we sometimes look to the smaller and more collegial of our two legislative bodies to provide leadership on challenging policy issues.

And finally I am given hope by the simple math of it all: a shrinking minority of legislators and the Governor opposed our bills. They backed the interests of a handful of multi-billion dollar corporations and fat-cat donors. But just how long do you think they can hold out with 73% of the public and the legislature supporting our cause? How long can a majority block, filibuster and obstruct progress before passage of time and rising of consciousness deliver a victory to our team?

Not long I think, not long. Stay tuned. The last vote on global warming is not cast yet in the legislature or in the voting booth and we're counting on your support to win the next round.

A Day to Run Away, A Day to Move Forward

First, a quick apology to those of you looking forward to a live blog from the State House yesterday. We ran into some significant technical issues that could not be resolved on site. So once again, my apologies.

Yesterday, as you all are aware, 61 members of the House voted to uphold Governor Douglas’ veto of the comprehensive energy efficiency and global warming bill. In spite of overwhelming scientific evidence pointing to the need for action and massive public support for the bill, these legislators buckled under the weight of special interest pressure.

Also, 50 members of the House voted against overriding Governor Douglas’ veto of the Campaign Finance bill. Perhaps with an eye on larger campaign donations from PACs and political parties, they once again decided to vote against the public interest.

Feel me building a rhythm here?

Finally, even after the pieces of the global warming bill that Governor Douglas deemed most offensive were taken out of the bill, 54 legislators could still not see their way clear though the heat, humidity and fog of special interest influence to do what’s right for Vermont.

In other words, they ran away.

They ran away from the facts and from the great weight of public opinion.

In fact, you can watch Governor Douglas showing them how to do it by running away from a polar bear and Bill McKibben right here:



However, it was also a day to move forward.

More than 400 Vermonters turned out yesterday to show their support for pro-active change in the way we do business, including Bill McKibben and a really cute polar bear who was sadly rejected by her legislators:

We lobbied our legislators, we showed our support to the heroes of this bill, and we made our positions known. We made it clear that the agents of business-as-usual and influence peddling are not the only voices in the State House. The people, too, have a voice and a say and if anything is clear from yesterday’s events it is that the while the enemies of progress won a victory, they are not going to win the war.

In other words, I think we’ll look back on the day as a last chance for those who do not believe in global warming or fair elections to celebrate victory in Vermont.

For the rest of us, it was our day to move forward.

Check out what Bill McKibben had to say at an historic address in the well of the House after the vote:

Thank you again everyone for coming together on a stormy afternoon and helping us push Vermont forward and make the future we all deserve.

Overrides Fail But the Battle Goes On...

Nearly 500 Vermonters filled the State House today in a passionate attempt to get their legislators to put politics aside and do the right thing for the future of this state by overriding two gubenatorial vetos of the campaign finance reform and global warming energy bills. Sadly, in both cases enough of those legislators failed to listen to the overwhelming majority of Vermonters and chose special interest over the public interest by voting to sustain the vetoes.

The good news is that we gained momentum -- and votes -- on every vote today. That, together with the hundreds of Vermonters that joined us in this effort, will help ensure that we carry this momentum forward to make sure that in the end, we prevail. As Bill McKibben said today, we are gaining momentum and we're not going away.

Stay tuned for more details from today's momentous events, including the appearance at the State House of that single polar bear that Jim Douglas refuses to help.

Are you ready to rumble?

Tomorrow is the big day for both campaign finance and global warming. The VPIRG office is a hub of activity: a crew of interns from our sibling-organization TAC is making posters and cutting the bright green stickers that activists will be wearing to identify themselves as pro-override; the copier is running at maximum speed churning out talking points, posters and flyers; and staff are furiously answering calls and emails from citizens all over the state who want to be part of the history made tomorrow. In a minute you'll get an email from us inviting you to join us at the State House tomorrow or call your legislator and tell them to vote yes on both override votes.

Earlier today, we held a news conference with AARP and VBSR releasing new poll data that shows a whopping 72% of Vermonters support H.520's plan to cut heating bills and global warming pollution. We also released a list of more than 150 Vermont businesses that have signed a petition endorsing the override - so much for the bill being anti-business, huh? Moments after our press conference ended, the Speaker and Pro-Tem emerged from a last meeting with Governor seeking a fair compromise on the bill. They left empty-handed. Governor Douglas, it seems, is more interested in scoring political points than advancing legislation that will lower heating bills, create jobs and fight global warming.

And so we go once more to the breach, and it's going to be quite a show. Not just the vote, mind you: our plans include speeches from Bill McKibben, musical performances by X10 and a local rock group, and a visit from a friendly polar bear - you know, the one Douglas doesn't think we can save?

I do hope you can join us, and once again I'll be blogging from the floor whenever the vote gets underway...thanks again!

What's up with the global warming override?

It's been a busy few weeks here at VPIRG and we are fielding a lot of calls from people asking "what's up with the that veto override on global warming?"


The answer is - well - complicated. But let me try and untangle the recent news into a clear narrative:


1) A growing list of celebrities and opinion leaders are joining the call for the override: Al Gore endorsed the override on June 6. Then last week local high school students and rappers X10 put out a serious, and seriously funny video endorsing the override. Now Bill McKibben has joined the call, inviting all Vermonters to join him at the State House on July 11 as we seek to make Vermont a national leader in the fight to stop global warming. Their support, and the voices of literally thousands of Vermonters like you has lead to an extraordinary few weeks of news and opinion coverage of this topic. It's been exciting seeing all these folks come together in support of the bill, and it's definitely making an impact on the legislators. We're hearing news that we're picking up more and more votes, but there's more work to be done (see below).


2) Democratic leaders did propose a compromise, but Douglas vetoed that too. As you may have read in the news, Senate Pro-Tem Peter Shumlin and House Chairman of the Energy and Natural Resource Committee Robert Dostis were planning to meet with Governor Douglas last week. The purpose of the meeting: to discuss the global warming bill and see if common ground or compromise could be found before the override vote on the 11th. But Douglas cancelled the meeting at the last minute, and Press Secretary Jason Gibbs made it clear that the Governor was not interested in any version of the bill. This sets up a tough scenario for the most talked-about version of a compromise: namely removing just the portion of the bill that makes Vermont Yankee pay the same property tax rate as wind farms (the bill would still contain about $17 million in funding from other sources, including a tax on wind farms).
To even vote on such a compromise, 3/4 of legislators would need to first support a procedural motion to 'suspend the rules' of the House. With the governor and special interests still opposing the bill -- even with the element they say most concerns them removed -- it's tough to envision coming up with the votes to pass such a compromise.


3) Which brings us to the bottom line: the vote to override the global warming veto is still on for July 11 and we need your help to win it. 3 things you can do to help in order of simplicity: Click here to email your Representatives and ask them to VOTE YES on the global warming override; Volunteer 2 hours to help call VPIRG members and ask them to support of the override by emailing drew@vpirg.org; Join us on July 11 at 9AM at the VT State House.


Thanks again for all you're doing, hope to see you soon.